Each Amendment to the Constitution came about 
for a reason — to overrule a Supreme Court decision, to force a societal 
change, or to revise the details of the Constitution. This page will give an 
overview of how each Amendment came to be.
The process for adopting an amendment is outlined 
elsewhere, as is the ratification history of 
each Amendment. A list of failed amendments is 
also available.
As noted on the Constitutional Convention Topic 
Page, several delegates to the convention refused to sign the newly drafted 
constitution because it did not include a bill of rights. Bills of rights were 
typically parts of the constitutions of the several states of the day (and 
today), placed there to ensure that certain rights were recognized by the 
government. Most of the delegates did not feel such a bill was necessary, and 
other may have been on the fence but were weary from the months of 
negotiations.
The lack of a bill of rights was one of the main arguments that Anti-Federalists used to try to convince the 
public to reject the Constitution. But the need for change was all too 
evident, and it was not rejected. However, some of the states sent suggestions 
for amendments to the Constitution to add an enumeration of certain rights. 
The ratification messages of the states included many varying suggestions, 
which the very first Congress took under consideration in its very first 
session.
Representative James Madison, who was so instrumental in the creation of the 
Constitution in the first place, drafted a bill of rights. Though he originally 
opposed the idea, by the time he ran for a seat in the House, he used the 
creation of a bill as part of his campaign. He introduced the bill into the House, which debated it 
at length and approved 17 articles of amendment. The Senate took up the bill 
and reduced the number to 12, by combining some and rejecting others. The House 
accepted the Senate’s changes, voting on September 24th and 25th, 1789; twelve 
articles of amendment were sent to the states for ratification.
The first two articles were not accepted by enough states, but the last ten 
were. We know them today as Amendments 1 through 10. The second article was 
eventually ratified as the 27th Amendment. The first ten amendments, 
collectively known as the Bill of Rights, were 
ratified on December 15, 1791 (811 days). A photographic image of the 
badly-faded original Bill is available on this 
site.
The 11th Amendment came about as a direct result 
of the Supreme Court decision in Chisholm v Georgia (2 U.S. 419) in 1793 
(see the Events Page for details). Congress felt that 
the Supreme Court had over stepped its bounds, and feared it would do so again 
unless prohibited by the Constitution. The Chisholm case was decided in 
1793, just five years after the adoption of the Constitution. The Amendment was 
approved by Congress on March 4, 1794, and ratified on February 7, 1795 (340 
days). The Amendment limits the jurisdiction of the federal courts to 
automatically hear cases brought against a state by the citizens of another 
state. Later interpretations have expanded this to include citizens of the 
state being sued, as well.
In Hollingsworth v Virginia (3 USC 378 [1798]), the passage and 
ratification of the 11th was challenged for two reasons. First because the 
President did not sign the amendment bill, and second because the amendment 
presented a situation where people had some legal relief before ratification 
that dried up after, creating an ex post facto situation. The Supreme Court 
rejected both challenges, setting some important precedent for future 
amendments.
The Constitution was written before parties were a player in American politics. 
When John Adams was chosen for President in the 1796 election, the second-place 
candidate, Thomas Jefferson, became Vice President — but Adams was a Federalist 
and Jefferson was a Democratic-Republican. The two clashed several times during 
Adams’s presidency, though Adams’s conflicts with Hamilton, a Federalist, too, 
probably caused Adams more concern.
In the election of 1800, the flaws of the original system became more than 
apparent. Jefferson and Aaron Burr both got 73 votes in the Electoral College, forcing the House of 
Representatives to choose. The problem? Both Jefferson and Burr were 
candidates of the same party, with Burr chosen to be the Vice President; some 
states preferred Burr, and neither was able to get the required majority until 
the stalemate was ultimately broken.
The result was the 12th Amendment, approved in 
Congress on December 9, 1803, and ratified on June 15, 1804 (189 days), in time 
for the new process to be in place for the 1804 election. With the 12th, 
Electors are directed to vote for a President and for a Vice President rather 
than for two choices for President.
Slavery was an institution in America in the 18th and 19th centuries. The 
Southern states, with their agricultural economies, relied on the slavery system 
to ensure the cash crops (cotton, hemp, rice, indigo, and tobacco, primarily) 
were tended and cultivated. Slaves were not unknown in the North, but abolition 
in the North was completed by the 1830’s. In 1808, the Congress prohibited the 
slave trade, not a year later than allowed in the Constitution. A series of 
compromises, laws, acts, and bills tried to keep the balance between the slave 
states and the non-slave states. For a more thorough history of slavery, see 
the Slavery Topic Page.
South Carolina voted to secede from the United States as a result of Abraham 
Lincoln’s election to the Presidency. Lincoln had, over time, voiced strong 
objections to slavery, and his incoming administration was viewed as a threat 
to the right of the states to keep their institutions, particularly that of 
slavery, the business of the states. More states seceded, eleven in all, 
forming the Confederate States of America. The secession movement led to the 
Civil War. In the waning days of the war, which ran from 1861 to 1865, the 
Congress approved an amendment to abolish slavery in all of the United States. 
Once the CSA was defeated, approval of the 13th 
Amendment was quick in the Northern states. By the end of 1865, eight of 
the eleven Confederate states had also ratified it. Proposed on January 31, 
1865, it was ratified on December 6, 1865 (309 days). Eventually, all of the 
CSA states except Mississippi ratified the 13th after the war; Mississippi 
ratified the amendment in 1995.
The ratification of the 13th Amendment was a major victory for the North, and it 
was hoped that with the Emancipation Proclamation and 
the 13th Amendment, the effects of slavery in the United States would quickly 
diminish. The original plan to readmit states after acceptance of the 13th was 
supported by President Andrew Johnson, but the Radical Republicans, as they 
became known, wanted more than just a return to normalcy. They wanted to keep 
the power they had attained during the war years. The South did not make it 
easy for Johnson, however, and the so-called Black Codes started to be passed in 
Southern states. Congressional inquiries into the Black Codes found them to be 
a new way of controlling ex-slaves, fraught with violence and cruelty.
The ensuing Reconstruction Acts placed the former CSA states under military 
rule, and prohibited their congressmen’s readmittance to Congress until after 
several steps had been taken, including the approval of the 14th Amendment. The 14th was designed to ensure 
that all former slaves were granted automatic United States citizenship, and 
that they would have all the rights and privileges as any other citizen. The 
amendment passed Congress on June 13, 1866, and was ratified on July 9, 1868 
(757 days).
The last of the Reconstruction Amendments, the 15th 
Amendment was designed to close the last loophole in the establishment of 
civil rights for newly-freed black slaves. It ensured that a person’s race, 
color, or prior history as a slave could not be used to bar that person from 
voting. Though a noble idea, it had little practical effect for quite some 
time, as the Southern states found myriad ways to intimidate blacks to keep 
them from voting. The Congress passed the amendment on February 26, 1869, and 
it was ratified on February 3, 1870 (342 days).
Though ratification of the 15th Amendment was not a requirement for 
readmittance of the Confederate states to the Congress, one of the provisions 
of the Reconstruction Acts required that the states include a provision in 
their new constitutions that included a near-copy of the text of the 15th. All 
of the CSA states except Tennessee, which was immune from the Reconstruction 
Acts, eventually ratified the 15th Amendment.
In 1895, in the Supreme Court case of Pollock v Farmer’s Loan and Trust 
(157 U.S. 429), the Court disallowed a federal tax on income from real 
property. The tax was designed to be an indirect tax, which would mean that 
states need not contribute portions of a whole relative to its census figures. 
The Court, however, ruled that the tax was a direct tax and subject to 
apportionment. This was the last in a series of conflicting court decisions 
dating back to the Civil War. Between 1895 and 1909, when the amendment was 
passed by Congress, the Court began to back down on its position, as it became 
clear not only to accountants but to everyone that the solvency of the nation 
was in jeopardy. In a series of cases, the definition of “direct tax” was 
modified, bent, twisted, and coaxed to allow more taxation efforts that 
approached an income tax.
Finally, with the ratification of the 16th 
Amendment, any doubt was removed. The text of the Amendment makes it clear 
that though the categories of direct and indirect taxation still exist, any 
determination that income tax is a direct tax will be irrelevant, because taxes 
on incomes, from salary or from real estate, are explicitly to be treated as 
indirect. The Congress passed the Amendment on July 12, 1909, and it was 
ratified on February 3, 1913 (1,302 days).
One of the most common critiques of the Framers is 
that the government that they created was, in many ways, undemocratic. There is 
little doubt of this, and it is so by design. The Electoral College, by which we choose our 
President, is one example. The appointment of judges is another. And the 
selection of Senators not by the people but by the state legislatures, is yet 
another. The Senatorial selection system eventually became fraught with 
problems, with consecutive state legislatures sending different Senators to 
Congress, forcing the Senate to work out who was the qualified candidate, or 
with the selection system being corrupted by bribery and corruption. In several 
states, the selection of Senators was left up to the people in referenda, where 
the legislature approved the people’s choice and sent him or her to the Senate. 
Articles written by early 20th-century muckrakers also provided grist for the 
popular-election mill.
The 17th Amendment did away with all the 
ambiguity with a simple premise — the Senators would be chosen by the people, 
just as Representatives are. Of course, since the candidates now had to cater 
to hundreds of thousands, or millions, of people instead of just a few hundred, 
other issues, such as campaign finances, were introduced. The 17th is not a 
panacea, but it brings government closer to the people. The Amendment was 
passed by Congress on May 13, 1912, and was ratified on April 8, 1913 (330 
days).
Consumption of alcohol was discouraged by law in many of the states over the 
first century of the United States under the Constitution. By 1855, 13 of the 
31 states had temperance, or alcohol prohibition, laws. The Civil War 
distracted the public from the temperance movement, but the proliferation of 
saloons after the Civil War, and the trappings of the saloons (like gambling, 
prostitution, and public drunkenness) led to the so-called “Women’s War” in 
1873. Over time, the movement became more organized and the Anti-Saloon League 
was established in 1893. The ASL’s goal was national prohibition, and it set 
up an office in Washington to that end — it even established its own publishing 
house in Westerville, Ohio.
The ASL polled candidates on their stand on the temperance question, 
endorsing candidates with a pro-temperance stance. In the election of 1915, 
ASL-sponsored candidates swept the elections for Congress, and on December 18, 
1917, Congress passed the 18th Amendment. It 
quickly was adopted by the states, being ratified in just over a year, on 
January 16, 1919 (394 days).
Though the Constitution originally made no mention of a woman’s right to vote, 
it was implied by society — women simply did not have the right. The 14th 
Amendment actually made things worse, by codifying the suffrage right to men 
only, when its Second Clause punished the denial of suffrage to men (though this 
still did not officially deny women the right). As early as 1848, groups met to 
discuss how to further women’s rights, and the franchise, it was decided, was 
the best place to start. But America was not ready, and the suffragists, as 
they were called, were branded as immoral.
Famous women’s rights leaders Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton 
tried to make a stand after the Civil War, to have the language of the 14th 
Amendment include women, though the issue was thought too volatile by most, and 
passage of the amendment was thought to be in grave jeopardy if such a 
provision were included. Anthony later used the 15th Amendment as rationale 
for voting in a New York election, and though she was tried and fined for 
voting, the ordeal proved an impetus for the eventual guarantee of voting 
rights for women. By 1918, about half the states had granted women full or 
partial voting rights; the stature gained by women involved in the temperance 
movement also helped push the suffragist movement along. The support of women 
to the war effort convinced many more, even President Woodrow Wilson, who had 
been staunchly opposed to a federal suffrage amendment. On June 4, 1919, the 
19th Amendment was passed by Congress, and it was 
ratified on August 18, 1920 (441 days).
The term “Lame Duck” originates in the mid 1700’s. It is applied to an elected 
official who has not been reelected, but still holds office. For example, in 
the United States today, the President is elected in November, and inaugurated 
in January of the following year — the time in between if the President was not 
reelected, is the lame duck period. Early in the political history of the 
nation, the period between the election and swearing-in of elected officials was 
a small issue. With slow methods of transportation and the nature of the 
politician in the 18th century, the lame duck period was almost a necessity. In 
fact, once the November election was established, it was more than a year before 
newly elected congressmen met in December.
But from the start, the lame duck period was a problem, most famously 
illustrated in the Marbury v Madison case, where lame-duck appointments 
by out-going President John Adams set the stage for a landmark Supreme Court 
decision with his series of late-night, last-minute appointments. The 20th Amendment cleared up this problem to a degree, 
by shortening the lame duck period. The Congress is sworn in on January 3 
following the election, and the President is sworn in on January 20, rather 
than the March 4th prescribed in the 12th Amendment. The Amendment also closes 
a gap in Presidential power by specifying what will happen if a President-elect 
dies before he is sworn in. The 20th Amendment was passed by Congress on March 
2, 1932, and was ratified by the states on January 23, 1933 (327 days).
The 20th reached some notoriety during the impeachment proceedings of 
President Bill Clinton in 1998; the final House vote was taken after the 1998 
elections, and the Senate was not scheduled to hear the case until after the 
swearing-in of the next Congress in 1999. Arguments that the 20th conceptually 
required a revote by the new House were fruitless, however.
It would be a disservice to say that the 18th Amendment was completely 
ineffective. It would also be a disservice to say that the 18th Amendment 
caused the lawlessness embodied by people like Al Capone. The 18th Amendment 
did reduce alcohol consumption in the United States, and it did not cause 
organized crime. In the Prohibition era, alcohol consumption (measured in 
gallons of ethanol consumed) dropped to an average of less than a gallon per 
person per year, down from two and a half gallons in 1915. And organized crime 
existed before Prohibition, and existed after it, too.
That having been said, the Prohibition era did have a certain sense of 
lawlessness; the very fact that consumption was not eliminated is testimony to 
that; and the fact that organized crime manufactured and distributed the bulk of 
the illicit alcohol of the 1920’s and early 1930’s is evidence that gangsters 
were aided by Prohibition. Enforcement was spotty, with stills and speakeasies 
popping up in every population center. Over-zealous police and federal agents 
violated civil rights when searching for and destroying the paraphernalia of 
alcohol. While most Americans respected the law, were in favor of the law, the 
shine of “dry” began to wear off, especially as the Great Depression set in.
A movement began to form to repeal the 18th Amendment. Prohibition of 
alcohol was seen as an affront to personal liberty, pushed on the nation by 
religious moralists. Alcohol was also seen as a source of revenue for the local 
and national governments. The effort to elect “wet” legislators was as grand as 
that to elect “dry” ones almost two decades earlier. The Congress passed the 
amendment on February 20, 1933 (288 days). It mandated, for the first time, 
that conventions of the states were to vote on the amendment, rather than the 
legislatures, feeling that conventions would be more apt to vote to ratify – 
and they did, quickly — the ratification process was complete on December 5, 
1933. The 21st Amendment repealed the 18th, the 
first time an amendment had been repealed by another.
Since the presidency of George Washington, only one thing could be said to be 
totally consistent — that no President had the job for more than two full terms. 
Washington had been asked to run for a third term in 1796, but he made it quite 
clear that he had no intention of doing so; that an orderly transition of power 
was needed to set the Constitution in stone. And so it was for almost 150 
years.
Franklin Delano Roosevelt was first elected President in 1932, and 
re-elected in 1936. When it came time for the Democrats to nominate a 
candidate for the Presidency in 1940, two things had happened. First, the 
Republicans had made great gains in Congress in the 1938 elections. And Hitler 
happened. Europe was in the throes of a great war, with trouble in the Pacific, 
too. A change away from Roosevelt, who had led the nation through the Great 
Depression, did not seem wise. He was nominated for an unprecedented third 
term, and won. It was not a landslide victory, however, and it is debatable 
that FDR would have had a third term had it not been for the war. When 1944 
rolled around, changing leaders in the middle of World War II, which the United 
States was now fully engaged in, also seemed unwise, and FDR ran for and was 
elected to, a fourth term.
The District of Columbia has been a unique city since its founding in 1800 as 
the seat of the new government. When first established, it was a town of 5000, 
and it was assumed that it would be the center of government, and not a 
population center. But by 1900, over a quarter of a million people lived within 
its bounds. Since it is a federal district, however, and not a state, the 
inhabitants not only had no real local government, they had no vote in the 
federal government either. By 1960, when 760,000 people lived in Washington, 
D.C., it seemed odd that people from a dozen states, with lower populations, had 
more voting rights than residents of the District. As citizens, they were 
required to pay taxes and to serve in the military, but a vote in the 
Presidential election was available only to the states.
It is important to note that the 23rd 
Amendment does not make Washington, D.C., a state; it just confers upon its 
citizens the number of electors that it would have if it were a state. It also 
did not provide full representation in Congress for the District. The Congress 
passed the amendment on June 17, 1960; the amendment was ratified on March 29, 
1961 (285 days).
One of the last legal vestiges of segregation was the effort to keep the black 
population from participating in the vote. With most methods for keeping the 
black vote to a minimum declared unconstitutional, several Southern states found 
an answer — the poll tax. The poll tax has a long history, and was often used 
in Europe to raise funds. With a poll tax, in order to vote, a certain tax must 
be paid. The tax is the same for all, which allowed the generally more affluent 
white population access to the polls with a minimum of pain, while the generally 
poorer black population would have trouble justifying trading food on the table 
for a vote in the ballot box. Worse, different kinds of poll taxes were 
implemented, some accumulating even if no attempt was made to vote, meaning 
increasingly higher back-taxes to be paid to gain the vote.
When Dwight Eisenhower was president, he suffered from several medical issues 
that created a power vacuum. Eisenhower and his Vice President Richard Nixon 
entered into an agreement that allowed Nixon to become Acting President while 
Eisenhower was incapacitated. The agreement was between the two men and did not 
have constitutional authority, but it set a precedent that was followed by the 
following presidents, John Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson.
Nothing prepared anyone, however, for the national tragedy of the Kennedy 
assassination. The 1963 assassination shocked the nation in more ways than the 
obvious. The advancement of medical technology had many hoping that the 
President could have been saved after being shot. That was not the case, but if 
he had been, Kennedy could have been in a coma for an extended period of time, 
perhaps never able to fully function again. The Eisenhower-Nixon agreement set 
some things in motion, but was extra-constitutional. The Vice President would 
be the President, but would not be able to fulfill his duties. The resulting 
power vacuum would cause a constitutional crisis — who has the power of 
the Presidency?
Less than two years after Kennedy’s death, on July 6, 1965, the Congress 
passed the 25th Amendment, where the line of 
succession was not only clarified, but what was to be done in the case of 
presidential disability was addressed. The selection of a Vice President for 
an empty Vice Presidential seat was also provided for. The states ratified the 
amendment on February 10, 1967 (584 days). The second clause, dealing with the 
filling of a vacancy in the Vice Presidency, was used less than six years later 
when Gerald Ford assumed the Vice Presidency upon the resignation of Spiro 
Agnew.
The United States was in the throes of the Vietnam War and protests were 
underway throughout the nation. Draftees into the armed services were any male 
over the age of 18. There was a seeming dichotomy, however: these young men 
were allowed, even forced, to fight and die for their country, but they were 
unable to vote. The 14th Amendment only guaranteed the vote, in a roundabout 
way, to those over twenty-one.
The Congress attempted to right this wrong in 1970 by passing an extension 
to the 1965 Voting Rights Act (which itself is enforcement legislation based on 
prior suffrage amendments) that gave the vote to all persons 18 or older, in 
all elections, on all levels. Oregon objected to the 18-year-old limit, as 
well as other provisions of the 1970 Act (it also objected to a prohibition on 
literacy tests for the franchise). In Oregon v Mitchell (400 U.S. 112), 
a sharply divided Supreme Court ruled that the Congress had the power to lower 
the voting age to 18 for national elections, but not for state and local 
elections. The case was decided on December 1, 1970. Within months, on March 
23, 1971, the Congress passed the text of the 26th 
Amendment, specifically setting a national voting age, in both state and 
national elections, to 18. In just 100 days, on July 1, 1971, the amendment 
was ratified.
The 27th Amendment was originally proposed on 
September 25, 1789, as an article in the original Bill of Rights. It did not 
pass the required number of states with the articles we now know as the first 
ten amendments. It sat, unratified and with no expiration date, in 
constitutional limbo, for more than 80 years when Ohio ratified it to protest a 
congressional pay hike; no other states followed Ohio’s lead, however. Again 
it languished, for more than 100 years.
In 1978, Wyoming ratified the amendment, but there was again, no follow-up 
by the remaining states. Then, in the early 1980’s, Gregory Watson, an aide to 
a Texas legislator, took up the proposed amendment’s cause. From 1983 to 1992, 
the requisite number of states ratified the amendment, and it was declared 
ratified on May 7, 1992 (74,003 days).